Letter to Fanny Austen (Knight), ? Thursday, 24 July 1806

In the collected letters of Jane Austen, so wonderfully researched and annotated by Deirdre Le Faye, which I have been blogging off and on; along with my other mostly literary theme essays — Austen’s letters are chiefly addressed to her older sister and confidante Cassandra Austen, although occasionally a letter to one of her brothers, or other family members or friends are included.  This letter its date marked with a question mark was sent to Austen’s niece Fanny.

Here is the preface text from LeFaye: “Lines written by Jane Austen for the amusement of a Niece (afterwards Lady Knatchbull) on the arrival of Captain & Mrs Austen at Godmersham Park soon after their marriage July 1806.”  

Excerpts from the Notes, also by LeFaye: “Description: Unknown, original Manuscript probably destroyed in the later nineteenth century. Provenance: Copied by Anna LeFroy into her Lefroy Manuscript, c. 1855. Publication: LeFaye, TLS, 20 Feb. 1987, p. 185.”

“The title is as given by Anna LeFroy; FWA [Francis-William Knight *aka Frank] and Mary Gibson were married at Ramsgate on Thurs. 24 July  1806 and came to Godmersham for their honeymoon on 26 July. FCK [Fanny-Catherine Knight] noted in her diary under date Tuesday, 29 July 1806: ‘I had a bit of a letter from Aunt Jane with some verses of hers.'”

The second part of LeFaye’s notes on this letter:  “Anna had made a mistake in copying, being unfamiliar with local Kentish geography; it is not ‘Stamford’ but ‘Shalmford’ bridge…Shalmford bridge still exists on the road leading into Chilham.” 

Okay, so unpacking here, Fanny was one of Edward’s children.  Edward was adopted by the Austen’s relations the Knights and became their legal heir.  Back then it was not so unusual and Edward was the recipient of their wealth including the Godmersham Park Estate and the Chasten House Estate where Jane Austen, her sister and her mother settled into a cottage on his property (not the great house).

Fanny though seems to have been a favorite of both Jane and Cassandra, in blogging the letters so far, I agree, Fanny is often mentioned fondly.  Back in 2010 there was a very interesting exhibition of Jane Austen’s letters at the Morgan Library in New York — that I traveled to see with my friend Toby,* and several letters to Fanny were included — one I remember was a birthday letter verse written backwards.  Here is a link to the archive for the exhibit.

https://www.themorgan.org/exhibitions/a-womans-wit

Jane Austen’s letters are incomplete, most certain are biographers that Cassandra burned a good number of them before distributing them to family members, etc.  I’m unsure if it was at the Morgan’s exhibit, or from what biography, but I know I have noted that Fanny, her niece also burned some of Austen’s letters.

Why they did this remains a mystery to all.  Most readers that enjoy Jane Austen lament it because we have learned a lot about her as an author and as a person in general from the letters.  That being said one of the theories is that Austen’s “wicked wit” perhaps went over the line, into what today, we would call: snark.  Perhaps that is why Cassandra and Fanny chose to burn certain letters because they felt her commentary on family and friends, and certain events — would just upset too many people.  

It’s ironic in a way because if there was a complete set of pristine letters we would all know more solid facts and have a trusted compendium, but the “gaps” which have lead to such a vibrant literary industry around Austen probably would not exist. Not just the biographies/the biographers and their theories.  But also the Jane Austen Universe, as I call it, those folks writing their own fiction to fill in those blanks — sort of their imaginary takes on her life and adventures. 

Back to Fanny, this letter was a verse celebrating the marriage of Uncle Frank and his new wife and their visit to Godmersham, Fanny’s home.  Again to note, many biographers have cited how Fanny was Jane’s favorite of her brother Edward’s children and of all her nieces and nephews.  

However, in my reading Jane Austen at Home, Lucy Worsley takes the time to detail that as Fanny got older, there were significant changes to their relationship possibly due to social class structures  and changing cultural climates:  “It makes it all the more surprising, years later, that Fanny was decidedly cool about Jane, writing that horrible, snobbish letter about the aunt to whom she has once been so close. Given the warmth of Jane’s surviving letters to Fanny, this seems strange and nasty,  But there are suggestions of what was to come even in the 1810’s.”

Worsley later details: “What we are seeing here is not just pure regrettable snobbery, but also a clash between generations, Jane Austen belongs to the more rowdy Georgian age, while her niece, who lived long enough to become a prim Victorian, disparages the manners of a whole generation along with her formerly beloved aunt. In addition, it shows the chasm between two branches of the family that was bridged only at the moment when Edward was plucked from his siblings and planted in the richer soil of Kent.” 

Also I want to include here, Worsley’s notation of Austen’s literary influence on Fanny and another niece Anna: “And Jane’s nieces both turned out, under her influence to be writers. Fanny was an assiduous diary-keeper.  Anna had more serious literary pretensions.”  Worsley also documents Anna and her cousin Fanny’s relationship, with Fanny encouraging Anna to marry an older suitor, not approved of by parents, and documenting her matchmaker type efforts in her letters to her former governess Miss Sharpe (also a playwright and Austen befriended her as well). The whole thing went sideways and apparently, Jane also did  documenting in her letters to Cassandra, and  gave her own pithy commentary on Anna’s inability perhaps to make good suitor type choices. 

Austen per Worsley also was kept in the loop of Fanny’s courting: “Jane delighted in Fanny’s letters and conversation about the progress of her love affairs, even if she too counseled caution. ‘Your mistake has been one that thousands of women fall into,’ she warned. ‘He was the first young Man who attached himself to you. That was the charm & the most powerful it is.'”

Fanny at this point, at least per Worsley; seemed to heed her Aunt Jane’s advice: “Jane was successful in her campaign to deter Fanny from marriage. Her Godmersham niece would remain single until she had reached the rather old age of twenty-seven.”  

So weighing in here, I think Worsley points out a few interesting events and I’m wondering if the long term impact was adverse with Fanny.  Maybe Fanny held it against Aunt Jane for this advice, maybe Fanny felt she was too cautious in following her Aunt’s advice and missed her window to marry.

Fanny did eventually marry and become Lady Knatchbull — per LeFaye’s notes the Knatchbulls and the Austens were distantly related and in 1820, she married Sir Edward Knatchbull of Mersham-le-Hatch. LeFaye details that Fanny was a second wife, and there were nine (9) children, but unclear if some were originally from his first marriage.  “Their eldest son Edward (1829-93), 1880 first Lord Brabourne, edited the Letters of Jane Austen (1884) from those he found amongst his mother’s possessions.

Again, a bit ironic, that Fanny’s stepson or son, would be the editor of Austen’s letters that he found with her papers.  Wondering if Fanny had a change of heart and if she originally intended to burn them all?  There is no way to know.

And back to the original letter, this is verse, sent by Jane Austen to her niece Fanny, re: the marriage of Uncle Francis (*Frank) and Mary:

“See they come, post hast from Thanet,

Lovely couple, side by side;

They’ve left behind them Richard Kennet

With the parents of the Bride!

 

Canterbury they have passed through; 

Next succeeded Shalmford-bridge;

Chilham village they came fast through;

Now they’ve mounted yonder ridge.

 

Down the hill they’re swift proceeding

Now they skirt the Park around;

Lo! The Cattle sweetly feeding

Scamper, startled at the sound!

 

Run, my Brothers, to the Pier gate!

Throw it open, very wide!

Let it not be said that we’re late

In welcoming my Uncle’s Bride!

 

To the house the chaise advances;

Now it stops–They’re here, they’re here!

How d’ye do, my Uncle Francis?

How does your Lady dear?

*My note/inserting Frank, & Toby not her real name.  All other notes and cites are to: 1) Jane Austen’s Letters, Fourth Edition, Collected and Edited by Deirdre Le Faye, Oxford University Press, 2011 and 2) Jane Austen at Home, A biography, Lucy Worsley, St. Martin’s Griffin, 2017.

Jane Austen’s love of flowers.

It is somewhat universally known, among readers and admirers of Jane Austen, at least, that she loved to walk, especially in gardens.  Most often at the estate(s) of her wealthy brother and on visits to other friends and family.

Recently read an article about Austen’s relationship to gardens was discussed in an interesting article published in Persuasions The Journal of the Jane Austen Society of North America, or JASNA.  Afterwards I noted two (2) of Austen’s favorite trees: Laburnum or golden chain and Syringa. To note, I failed to pull the title and author, and I’m hoping to correct this when JASNA posts the digital issues online, they have some posted from the archives, but this was a more recent article in late 2023 or early 2024, and so I will keep checking.

Per searching online the Laburnum or golden chain, looks sort of like a weeping willow, only the flowers are a pretty yellow-golden color.  Syringa — Latin name for lilac, or a smallish type of common lilac syringa vulgaris, again per searching online, I learned is found in the United States mostly in the Pacific Northwest.  If this is exact type of lilac that Austin loved, I am still unsure.

To note, when I started this blog, I had some photos of lilacs I took as the original cover photos but I was unaware of Austen’s love for them.  My mum always loved lilacs, and had hoped to carry them when she married my dad, but it was too late in the season for them in 1964 and most florists did not have the capacity to import them. My mum did have one florist friend who probably could have special ordered/imported them, but she always said she did not want to bother him — I think though to clarify she probably did not want to do anything too expensive. My folks had a small wedding and it was not easy for them, they saved for four years to buy a house before they married.

The photo I have photos posted of the lilacs over the years are from the original bush on the side of our house by our front door.  Years later my dad added a small white lilac that does bloom for a short time and another purple lilac on the other side of our front walk, which has another short bloom cycle — I don’t think it likes the wind off the beach.  My friend Kay helped me trim all this past fall and she said the original lilac will need more pruning in the spring after it flowers — it was quite overgrown.

The idea that Austen loved lilacs is just somewhat comforting to me along with the connection to my mum.

In a related note, in the book, Jane Austen at Home, by Lucy Worsley, there were mixed feelings about moving to Castle Square in Southampton, including the crowded quarters and the wind and the weather, however, “The compensatory garden — a gardener was engaged to improve it — was to contain sweetbriar, roses, syringa, currants, gooseberries and raspberries…Jane requested Cassandra bring back ‘some flower-seeds from Godmersham particularly Mignonette.'”

To note, along with salt tolerant sunflower seeds and sea lavender I’ve order Mignonette seeds as well.  The nursery’s online catalog said they do well in pots at least 6 inches in diameter.  The seed packet is large so I may give some to friends and family too but along with the lilacs, for now, trying to bring a little Austen into both the back and front gardens.

Cite to: Jane Austen at Home. A Biography, Lucy Worsley, St. Martin’s Griffith, NY, 2017.

Essay on Hallmark’s Austen’s Loveuary by Grace Wheniainen – Bustle dot com

Sharing an essay sent to me by my friend Toby,* a different take on Hallmark’s recent February series “Loveuary” with Jane Austen inspired films. It is interesting and features a quote from Austen scholar Devoney Looser, who has seemed to change her opinion about Hallmark adaptations and variations based on Austen’s books.  Link is below. *Not her real name.

https://www.bustle.com/entertainment/hallmark-jane-austen-movies-loveuary-mr-darcy-regency-romances

Hallmark’s “Loveuary with Jane Austen” — Three different films.

As I previously posted, my friend Toby (not her real name), alerted me to Hallmark’s February 2024 — “Loveuary with Jane Austen” film series. As I previously wrote, I was wary, citing Austen Scholar Devon Looser specifically about Austen’s treatment by Hallmark, but after reading the article Toby sent me — I decided to keep an open mind. The night of the first movie, Toby texted to remind me/see if I was watching, she found the first movie quite “a hoot.” Here is my break down of these Austen variations by Hallmark — spoilers follow. Please note, yes this is a long essay.

“Paging Mr. Darcy,” written by Reina Hardy. This story centers on Eloise an Austen scholar and professor who has been invited to be the keynote speaker at a conference of JALA — the Jane Austen League of America — a fictionalized organization I presume modeled on the actual JASNA — Jane Austen Society of North America. Eloise has issues about this key note speaker invite, she is an introvert and not comfortable in the cos-play the folks dressing up for the conference or the idea of public speaking, To note, I find the public speaking thing odd because as a professor you have to be out there speaking in front of your students and expected to schlep around and present research and papers to academic conferences, etc. — so it is part of the job description. Anyway, Eloise conceded to do this keynote because the JALA conference is run by Dr. Jennings of Princeton University, and Eloise is trying to land a coveted job there.

To Eloise’s horror, she is met at the airport — by a guy in full on Darcy Regency costume. People are staring and taking photos and Eloise freaks out, and initially refuses the courtesy ride to the hotel. To note, usually fetching a guest speaker or VIP from the airport is an underling job/for an assistant, and I say that as having held such bad jobs like that. See also The Devil Wears Prada — the film not the book. But apparently she is a conference VIP and Sam, the Conference’s designated Mr. Darcy was assigned to her. The idea why Sam showed up in costume is resolved — somewhat — a bit later.

Turns out that Sam, is the nephew of the Conference organizer/Dr. Jennings, which made me actually think of the book and film Austenland — it’s always a nephew helping out, but I think that is usually a nod to Austen’s own Lady Catherine, Darcy’s Aunt. Post airport run fiasco, Eloise and Sam end up in a kind of deal, Sam does not trust one of the other conference attendees/job applicants a former stage actor (he played Wickham) and academic also wants this same job — so Sam in protecting his aunt, Dr. Jennings, agrees to help Eloise with her misgivings about the conference and help her lobby to help land the job. This includes an introduction to his friend Annabelle — who is selling regency era dresses and wares onsite at the conference.

Then, Eloise offers to step up and help Sam when his aunt reports the caterers have cancelled. Again, weird logistics instead of going to the hotel/resort kitchen they run out to a sandwich chain shop and buy pounds of meat and all their fruit cups. Later though, Sam brings Eloise to an exhibit of Jane Austen’s letters, again logistics — this type of library exhibit would definitely be on the conference agenda — yet Sam and Eloise wander around alone and she gives her theories about how most folks are wrong about Mr. Darcy being based on Tom Lefroy — and they are chatting and then flirting before the requisite librarian shushing them.

Back at the conference/hotel and resort, things get complicated for Eloise (the introvert sister) with the unexpected arrival her sister Mia (the extrovert). And, if we are referencing Austen, specifically Sense and Sensibility, Eloise is the Eleanor (practical and down to earth) and Mia the Marianne (romantic, dramatic) — even the letters of the names match up to The Dashwood Sisters.

So, Mia’s long term boyfriend finally proposed to her but it was just a casual/regular question, he did not plan anything romantic or special, and she freaked out/broke it off with him. Mia mopes and grieves for awhile but then comes out of hotel room seclusion and joins the conference — it’s just a whirlwind of one misadventure after another, the ex shows up, Eloise’s student casts Mia as the lead with Sam in her play for the conference and then Mia blabs to Dr. Jennings about how Eloise does not believe in all the costumes and regalia around Austen conferences, etc. Eloise goes into a weird spin thinking that Sam is now smitten with Mia and gives him a dressing down about not wanting to dance at the conference ball — Sam tells her quite that she has hurt his feelings — and he does not want to dance with [or be with] someone that does not want to be with him.

Eloise eventually comes out of the tail spin, she approaches Annabelle, Sam’s friend and costume lady who helps her out with a Regency dress and clarifies that Sam too is an introvert. Per Annabelle, Sam was a shy nerd who discovered he could put on a costume and become someone else and it gave him the ability to do things otherwise he could not. To note, I’m thinking maybe that is why he wore the costume to the airport pick up — to be able to sort of charm Eloise in full Darcy mode. From other expository: Sam also was a tech guy who left to do a nonprofit start up — there is a weird run-in scene with golf bros/dudes at the resort/conference.

There were several plot lines here: Eloise and her anxiety issues/job hunt, Eloise and Sam’s JASL convention romance, and Eloise and her sister relationship centered on her sister’s very recent disappointment around a marriage proposal.

As in Austen and also Hallmark, things turn out okay. Eloise wears the Regency dress and then before she can give her speak to open the ball — Mia’s boyfriend appears, clad in the Darcy jacket/outfit and proposes in front of the entire audience — romantic overture — ta-dah!

To note, in Austen’s books, proposals are usually not romantic events — the logistics and the practical gestures are more valued. Darcy’s proposal to Elizabeth, where she accepts is low key on their walk with Jane and Bingley. And the idea that he saved Jane and Lydia were the wide sweeping Romantic gestures — chiefly behind the scenes because: 1) He did not want credit for them, 2) Even though her Aunt spilled the truth to Elizabeth, and Elizabeth spilled to her dad — mostly Darcy did not get credit for saving the day — which he did for her and only her — there’s the romance still that holds up today. Sacrifice and sacrifice with no credit what so over beats all. Bad boy with a heart of gold icon — yes I daresay.

Back in this film’s third act — Eloise opens the ball and in her speech is honest about her issues and misgivings with doing this type of conference, making the speaking appearance, dressing the part, etc., and she learns from her now engaged sister that she had no designs on Sam, she talked his ear off about her boyfriend’s lame proposal, and so Sam reached out the boyfriend/loaned him the Darcy costume and coached him, etc. Eloise also lands the Princeton job and she and Sam learn, the guy they thought was her rival for the employment never even replied, in a very Austen’s Persuasion twist, he was just looking for a second chance from a young love that did not previously work out because he left for his theater career. And finally, Eloise and Sam patch things up, have a dance and a kiss and the end.

Overall: I’d say okay because some parts were cute. I’m unfamiliar with the actress who played Eloise, but the actor who played Sam: Will Kemp who is a Hallmark veteran player with solid chops and good comedic timing made this work as best he could. This one of the three I think I liked the best.

“Love and Jane” — Was the 2nd Loveuary film written and directed by David Weaver and with actress Alison Sweeney as the lead Lilly — to note she was also a producer. In this film, Lilly is a woman/writer who started off strong in her literary career, she won some sort of a Young and Up and Coming Writer’s award but then had to pay the bills so she took a lowly copyrighting job at an advertising agency in Boston. Yes, to note this one is set my home city and they did use some exterior shots. The rest, you can tell was shot elsewhere, probably in Canada. Lilly hosts a Jane Austen Society Book Club at a local English Pub. Again, logistics: actually I can think of only one English pub Cornwall’s near Kenmore Square and Fenway Park. Irish pubs throw a stone and you will hit several. Yes as most UK folks will tell you, there is a difference. Just saying.

Okay, so Lilly’s Jane Austen Society book group meets at this pub and on the way she realizes that she left her copy of the Austen novel they are to discuss at home. And she visits a local indie bookshop West Street Books to buy another copy for her meeting. To note, I think this may be a nod to the The Brattle bookstore or book shop, a big indie bookshop actually located on West Street in downtown Boston. As she is about to pull the volume from the shelf this big tall guy Trevor pulls it away. He tells her that it has just been sold through their web site and he can order her a copy from 1-2 days. Lilly tries to implore she should have dibs as on onsite in person sale, but Trevor is unmoved (and personally — thought perhaps neurodivergent), so she hits a wall and later recaps meeting a very frustrating man/clerk in the store. Also just before the meeting, the venerable pub owner says he is retiring/selling and so they must meet else where but he will try to help her find another place, etc.

Turns out that Trevor too is a tech entrepreneur who recently bought West Street Books and wants to try to re-invent it and so he is now a client at the ad agency. Lilly is duly pulled into to work on the pitch because he boss dimly recalls that Lilly runs a book group and so she is stuck. Plus the venerable bar keep has made friends with Trevor and arranged for Lilly to move her Jane Austen Society book group to the bookstore — yikes.

In between all of this, Lilly dismisses a proposal from a long time boyfriend who wants to marry and move to Chicago, where she can write and give up the day job. But Lilly is just independent and wants to succeed by her pen on her own, not having someone else paying the bills.

All this crisis and upheaval, apparently summons the spirit of Jane Austen herself from the ether. There is the hit and miss meet cute — but finally tea and counseling by the spirit of Jane Austen. Austen here is played straight forward and blithely and seems to accept Lilly’s answers about music and computers without too much follow up. Discussing the ex-boyfriend and Trevor though, “Jane” asks Lilly about their status and income, questioning if he owns cattle — which I thought was a weird device — as Lilly herself an Austen lover seemed befuddled and dismissed it saying that no they worked both work in tech so no cattle — no logistical confirmation if “Jane” actually comprehends “tech.” Overall, this could have been better expository maybe having “Jane” ask if they were gentry or had an estate would have been more appropriate. The cattle question was making “Jane” sound kind of flakey and by Lilly’s reaction, supposedly a life long fan that summoned her — even more so.

The theme of writing and Lilly’s ability and independence, reoccurs as her relationship evolves with Trevor.  Inspired by “Jane’s counsel,”  Lilly has submitted to an indie press and is thrilled to be accepted, but then learns that Trevor bought it.  Turns out they accepted her before the Trevor buy out, but to Lilly it still feels like a set up and failure to succeed on her own.  So, two (2) plots here to resolve, Lilly’s writing/career issues and her romance with Trevor.

Note here, Austen did write in solitude as most writers do.  When it came to placing her work though she was assisted for better or worse, by her father and brother, and then brother took over completely after her passing.  To return to this film, it does untangle, and full disclosure I did fall asleep.  Had to re-watch a few times in revision.  It does predictably end well with Lilly reconciling with Trevor somewhat as an agree to disagree but more vague terms  — at the end, he is literally on her door step.  He tells her also:  1) He is making in store onsite purchases the priority over the store’s web site and 2) He is investing in some sort of eco-livestock interest a/k/a cattle.  Strange plot cite tied up, full circle as “Jane” post their last heart to heart chat, fades into the ether. 

The third film, “An American in Austen,” written by Cameron Johann concerns Harriet who actually, receives a lovely proposal from her log term boyfriend Ethan.  Harriet,  hesitates and says maybe, basing her reaction on her long term love for Pride and Prejudice and her long time wish of meeting her own Mr. Darcy via the sweep off the feet cliche.

Somehow via her ride share ride home Harriet is transported into fictional  Pride and Prejudice (P&P) and she is welcomed by the Bennet family as their American cousin. To note, her I’m unfamiliar with the actress actually named Eliza Bennet (yes her real name I checked IMDB dot com ), that played Harriet but I thought she did a good job with what she had to work with for the script.  The scenes where she keeps waking to the rooster in a nod again to the “Ground Hog Day” movie were pretty good plus her trying to get into a corset — well done. 

At first Harriet thinks this was a proposal re-do like an “Austen Land” immersion, but eventually and quickly learns she is in imaginary P&P and she is messing up the narratives of the novel, Darcy finds her an interesting weird creature and Mr. Collins proposes to Mary, and Elizabeth runs off with Wickham. To note, personally I always did feel Mary was disappointed post Elizabeth’s refusal that Charlotte grabbed Collins, and she was not considered — personally I felt that Mary would have welcomed or jumped at that opportunity.  Maybe the writer of this film felt this way too about an alternate Austen universe.  

Think the trouble here was that the main narrative was the two-fer of 1) Harriet trying to get out of the fictional book and back to her real life, 2) Harriet trying to right the story.  And Harriet sees Ethan in the imaginary Merton and along the way she has thrown over a perfectly good person and relationship for something unrealistic — plus she learns she is trapped in imaginary Austen that she keep hoping is a dream — disappointed waking up to the rooster each morning, etc.  

Harriet somewhat corrects the narrative and it this takes her out of the imaginary world back to reality, back to the ride share in present day.   Harriet goes straight to Ethan’s doorstep and pours out her apology and her heart to his door bell slash voice mail but he is there watching her returning from around the corner, and all ends well.  Did not fall asleep but I felt like this one was really stretched out to make the two hour time frame and had to keep sort of prodding myself awake. 

Next Saturday is Mahogany – Hallmark’s interracial adaptation of Sense and Sensibility to end the month, I’m hoping this is much more well written and enjoyable. 

Re-Read February 2024: I Know Why the Caged Bird sings by Maya Angelou.

February is Black history month in the United States. In my office, our new Diversity Director is re-starting our book club with Caste: The Origin of Our Disconents by Isabel Wilkerson which I read a couple of years ago.

Reading more Black and Diverse authors is an ongoing priority for me, and I am also reading and re-reading books as I downsize, so I recently re-read Maya Angelou’s autobiographical novel: I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings.

The details about her life and coming of age in Stamps, Arkansas with her grandmother and her great uncle under segregation are graphic and vivid.  As well as her own plus her younger brother’s struggles being raised apart from their parents, their reunion with their mother in St. Louis and subsequent events that changed her childhood and youth forever.

It is not a long book, but brutally honest about life and American culture of segregation plus the trauma of childhood assault.